Teetrack vs Harvest: Which Time Tracking and Invoicing Tool Fits Your Team?

A practical comparison for teams that track time and invoice clients.

Compare Teetrack and Harvest across pricing, invoicing maturity, payment collection, and data hosting to find the right fit for your billing workflow.

FeatureTeetrackHarvest
Pricing modelFlat $9/month regardless of team size$9–$14/seat/month (per-seat, annual)
Payment collectionInvoice generation onlyStripe and PayPal built in
Accounting integrationNot includedQuickBooks and Xero auto-sync
Expense trackingNot includedBuilt in with receipt photos
AI/MCP toolsMCP server for Claude, ChatGPT, CopilotNo AI integrations
Data hostingHetzner, GermanyUS-based (Bending Spoons)

Invoicing and billing

FeatureTeetrackHarvest
Invoice generation from tracked time
Client payment collection (Stripe/PayPal)
Accounting sync (QuickBooks/Xero)
Multi-currency billing

Project and expense management

FeatureTeetrackHarvest
Project budget tracking
Expense tracking with receipts
Profitability reporting
Timesheet approvals

Pricing and infrastructure

FeatureTeetrackHarvest
Flat-rate pricing
EU data hosting
AI/MCP integrations
Free tier

Choose Teetrack for flat-rate pricing and EU hosting; choose Harvest for payment collection and accounting sync.

Teetrack is the stronger fit for freelancers and small agencies that want predictable costs and EU data residency without per-seat pricing. Harvest is the better choice for professional services teams that need end-to-end billing — from tracked time through Stripe payment collection to QuickBooks sync — and are willing to pay per seat for that workflow maturity.

Frequently Asked Questions

Compare for yourself — start tracking in Teetrack

Start free — no card required

Run both tools side by side for a billing cycle to see which workflow fits your team.