Teetrack vs Rize: Deliberate Tracking vs Zero-Touch AI
Rize captures automatically. Teetrack lets you review calendar suggestions before they count.
An objective evaluation of Teetrack and Rize across capture mechanism, MCP access tier, iCal breadth, free tier availability, and which approach fits your billing workflow.
| Feature | Teetrack | Rize |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | Yes — 5 projects, 1 calendar, 90-day history | No free tier — 7-day trial only; Basic starts at $12.99/mo |
| Capture mechanism | Calendar import + manual timers; draft entries reviewed before they count | Zero-touch AI desktop capture, auto-categorized by client and project |
| MCP access tier | Available on every tier (timers, tracks, projects, clients, tags, summaries, calendar, settings) | Business only ($49.99/mo) |
| iCal feed import | Google Calendar, Outlook, and iCal — all three with background auto-import | No iCal feed import |
| Per-track rate override | Yes — billing rate and currency per individual entry | Not available |
| Primary audience | Solo freelancers who want intent-based tracking and clean export to their billing stack | Individuals and teams who prefer zero-touch AI categorization over manual entry |
Time Tracking
| Feature | Teetrack | Rize |
|---|---|---|
| Manual timers (start/stop) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Zero-touch AI desktop capture | ✗ | ✓ |
| Draft review before entries count | ✓ | ✗ |
| Retroactive time editing | ✓ | ✓ |
Calendar Integration
| Feature | Teetrack | Rize |
|---|---|---|
| Google Calendar sync | ✓ | ✓ |
| Outlook Calendar sync | ✓ | ✓ |
| iCal feed import | ✓ | ✗ |
| Keyword-based project matching (Pro) | ✓ | ✓ |
MCP & API
| Feature | Teetrack | Rize |
|---|---|---|
| MCP integration for AI assistants | ✓ | ✓ |
| MCP available on every tier | ✓ | ✗ |
| Full OAuth 2.0 server with PKCE | ✓ | ✗ |
Privacy & Monitoring
| Feature | Teetrack | Rize |
|---|---|---|
| No screenshots or keystroke logging | ✓ | ✓ |
| No passive background desktop agent | ✓ | ✗ |
| EU hosting (Hetzner, Germany) | ✓ | ✗ |
Pricing
| Feature | Teetrack | Rize |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✗ |
| Entry-level paid plan under $15/mo | ✓ | ✓ |
| MCP on every tier (no Business-tier required) | ✓ | ✗ |
Rize leads on AI momentum; Teetrack leads on manual control, iCal breadth, and MCP without the Business-tier price.
Rize is a genuine option for solo professionals who want zero-touch time capture. Its AI categorizes desktop activity by client and project without you starting a timer, and its April 2026 MCP Beta extends that into AI assistant workflows — but only on the $49.99/mo Business tier. Teetrack's angle is different: calendar events from Google, Outlook, or iCal become draft entries you review and confirm before they count. Nothing is captured without your approval. MCP is available on every tier, covering timers, tracks, projects, clients, tags, summaries, calendar, and settings. Rize has no free tier and no iCal support. Teetrack has both. If you left an AI tracker because misclassified entries created billing disputes, Teetrack's deliberate start/stop approach gives you back that control.
Frequently Asked Questions
See how Teetrack compares on deliberate capture, iCal, and MCP access
Start freeNo credit card required. If zero-touch AI capture is your priority, Rize's Business tier delivers that.
