Teetrack vs Timely: Manual Review vs Passive AI Capture

Solo professionals who want to approve every time entry before it becomes a record. Teetrack has a permanent free tier, a flat €4/month on Business for a single user, and connects to any iCal-compatible calendar. Timely is designed for agencies where passive background recording recovers hours that would otherwise go untracked.

Teetrack connects to Google, Outlook, and any standards-compliant iCal feed — Apple Calendar, Fastmail, Proton Calendar, or any URL-based subscription. Timely works with Google and Outlook but does not accept iCal feed URLs. For users outside the Google and Microsoft ecosystems, this gap is decisive.

AutoSheet is Timely's AI-generated timesheet feature, updated in March 2026 with week view and batch editing. It draws on Memory desktop recordings to propose entries you approve. Teetrack has no equivalent — instead, calendar events become draft entries you confirm individually. The two tools solve the same problem from opposite directions: Timely automates first, Teetrack reviews first.

Teetrack ships native MCP tools on every paid tier, covering timers, tracks, projects, clients, tags, summaries, and settings. You can start a timer or pull a weekly summary directly from Claude, ChatGPT, or Copilot. Timely has no known MCP integration as of mid-2026.

Teetrack is a single-user tool at a flat €4/month on Business. Timely starts at $9/member annually on Starter (reaching $22/member on Unlimited) and has no free tier. Teetrack is not a per-seat team product, so the two only compare for an individual: if you need multi-user tracking, Timely is the team option; for solo billing, Teetrack’s flat €4/month is the simpler pick.